Compare ShareFile vs Box
Compare ShareFile and Box across pricing, security, compliance, workflow depth, and overall fit.
Use this snapshot to compare positioning, pricing posture, and the type of workflow each tool fits best.
| Metric | ShareFile | Box |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | United States | Redwood City, USA |
| Free trial | No free tier | 14 days (business plans) |
| Starting price | $77/user/month, 5-user minimum (from $385/month) | Per-user plans published by Box, free personal tier |
| Primary focus | Compliance-oriented enterprise sharing | Enterprise content cloud, not a deal room |
| Best fit | regulated file sharing | company-wide document storage |
ShareFile and Box solve related problems, but they optimize for different team needs and buying criteria.
Compliance-oriented enterprise sharing
ShareFile is positioned around compliance-oriented enterprise sharing.
Best for
Enterprise content cloud, not a deal room
Box is positioned around enterprise content cloud, not a deal room.
Best for
These are the core capabilities that most often separate a strong shortlist from a weak one.
| Feature | ShareFile | Box |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual data room workflows | ||
| Q&A workflow | ||
| Granular permissions | ||
| Watermarking | ||
| NDA gating | ||
| Desktop sync | ||
| Offline access | ||
| HIPAA-ready posture |
Even when public pricing is incomplete, the commercial model is still a strong signal for product fit.
$77/user/month, 5-user minimum (from $385/month)
No free tier
enterprise seat-based pricing
regulated sharing, integrations, and enterprise controls matter more than low-cost storage
Per-user plans published by Box, free personal tier
14 days (business plans)
per-user subscription with enterprise tiers
your company already standardises on Box for everyday files and the sharing is internal or low-risk
Use these notes to frame what each platform does well and what you should validate in a trial.
Strengths
Considerations
Strengths
Considerations
The better choice usually depends on the workflow around the room, not only the room itself.
ShareFile is the stronger fit when regulated sharing, integrations, and enterprise controls matter more than low-cost storage. Box stands out when your company already standardises on Box for everyday files and the sharing is internal or low-risk.
If this decision matters commercially, test both products and compare permissions, external UX, reporting, and support between ShareFile and Box.
ShareFile is usually the better fit when regulated sharing, integrations, and enterprise controls matter more than low-cost storage. Box is often better when your company already standardises on Box for everyday files and the sharing is internal or low-risk.
The clearest differences usually show up around Virtual data room workflows, Q&A workflow, Granular permissions when comparing ShareFile and Box.
ShareFile uses enterprise seat-based pricing. Box uses per-user subscription with enterprise tiers. Confirm actual cost with a live quote or scoped trial.
On this page