Compare Datasite vs Intralinks
Compare Datasite and Intralinks across pricing, security, compliance, workflow depth, and overall fit.
Use this snapshot to compare positioning, pricing posture, and the type of workflow each tool fits best.
| Metric | Datasite | Intralinks |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1999 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | Minneapolis, USA | New York, USA |
| Free trial | Demo on request, no free trial | Demo on request |
| Starting price | Not published (per-page quotes, often around $0.60 per page) | Not published (enterprise packages often from about $10,000 per deal) |
| Primary focus | Enterprise M&A platform for large, complex deals | Bank-grade VDR for regulated, high-stakes transactions |
| Best fit | large and mid-market M&A with many bidders | investment banks and large corporates |
Datasite and Intralinks solve related problems, but they optimize for different team needs and buying criteria.
Enterprise M&A platform for large, complex deals
Datasite is positioned around enterprise m&a platform for large, complex deals.
Best for
Bank-grade VDR for regulated, high-stakes transactions
Intralinks is positioned around bank-grade vdr for regulated, high-stakes transactions.
Best for
These are the core capabilities that most often separate a strong shortlist from a weak one.
| Feature | Datasite | Intralinks |
|---|---|---|
| API or integration depth | ||
| Granular permissions | ||
| Watermarking | ||
| Q&A workflow | ||
| Analytics and reporting | ||
| AI or automation | ||
| OCR or full-text search | ||
| Built-in redaction |
Even when public pricing is incomplete, the commercial model is still a strong signal for product fit.
Not published (per-page quotes, often around $0.60 per page)
Demo on request, no free trial
quote-based, usually per page or per project
you run large sell-side processes with many bidders, need AI-assisted indexing and redaction, and have the budget for per-page pricing
Not published (enterprise packages often from about $10,000 per deal)
Demo on request
quote-based enterprise contracts, sometimes billed per page
you are a bank, fund or corporate with strict compliance requirements and a procurement process that expects an enterprise vendor
Use these notes to frame what each platform does well and what you should validate in a trial.
Strengths
Considerations
Strengths
Considerations
The better choice usually depends on the workflow around the room, not only the room itself.
Datasite is the stronger fit when you run large sell-side processes with many bidders, need AI-assisted indexing and redaction, and have the budget for per-page pricing. Intralinks stands out when you are a bank, fund or corporate with strict compliance requirements and a procurement process that expects an enterprise vendor.
If this decision matters commercially, test both products and compare permissions, external UX, reporting, and support between Datasite and Intralinks.
Datasite is usually the better fit when you run large sell-side processes with many bidders, need AI-assisted indexing and redaction, and have the budget for per-page pricing. Intralinks is often better when you are a bank, fund or corporate with strict compliance requirements and a procurement process that expects an enterprise vendor.
The clearest differences usually show up around API or integration depth, Granular permissions, Watermarking when comparing Datasite and Intralinks.
Datasite uses quote-based, usually per page or per project. Intralinks uses quote-based enterprise contracts, sometimes billed per page. Confirm actual cost with a live quote or scoped trial.
On this page